Purple Paradise Projects
The Purple Paradise Resort Tech Team are posting their Proposed Projects with the intent to seek Funders and/or Investors for all or any listed below. For the entire Proposal, use the Contact Us form. We will respond as soon as possible.
Part A: Strategy
First considerations to be made:
Any public presentation has to be attractive for development. There are many that are needed, but are too dry for the general public to find interesting. In today’s world, the typical surfer on the web has an attention span of 30 seconds. That means that this paragraph is already too long for most that peruse the web, and project managers want at most a 1 page summary for a typical project, which is difficult to distill, unless one puts them into a Power Point presentation.
Politics: Any project has to conform to the political constraints of society and is especially true of any deemed “disruptive” product. This is a very severe constraint, as most new tech is disruptive to the political status quo. When I wrote the paper “Politics and Energy”, I outlined that inventors—the creative elements necessary to the future of society—are now considered expendable, and the ones cognizant of this fact hide like rabbits while they work in secret. The ones who are less savvy try to present it as if they will be hailed heroes only to discover that their homes are bombed and burglarized and loved ones threatened or killed.
So we have two severe constraints to deal with. The first one is easily dealt with, but the second has to be considered carefully with an airtight strategy. With that in mind here is the plan:
There is a binary plan that comprises two things that accomplish both goals simultaneously: We do what every large corporation or government think tank does—we have a front organization that produces consumer grade devices that are not disruptive, but innovative enough to catch the interest of the consumer. These can be as innocuous as ultrasonic hair brushes, or screwdrivers that are tuned to the screw they are supposed to loosen. They can be innovative, but not disruptive power storage systems like the power wall or power tower. We can have an entire catalog of non-disruptive tech that is offered both to the public as well as investors. These items are “sexy” enough that it catches the interest, and sell well. They are also simple enough that they can be put into production quickly with a good ROI (return on investment).
The other part is called the Advanced Projects Division (APD). The APD may not be physically at the same location, but communicates with the front office, and also shares resources to mask what it is doing. In the engineering companies where I worked, even CEOs would not want to go there unless absolutely necessary to give them plausible deniability to the CFO. The APD works on tech that may be 6 months to 5 years away from market. The people who work at the APD are cloistered away to prevent leaking the tech to either competitors or government that might consider stealing it. They remain focused and move forward quietly. When the tech has come to full term, they patent it using international patents in multiple countries to prevent one nation-state from stealing it in the name of national security. The inventor/engineers are protected while they work there, and are compensated well for their creative abilities, also owning a part of their work either as their own names or pseudonyms. This prevents the “open season on inventors” syndrome.
It has to be determined what the fraction will be as far as the division between the front office/lab and APD. It has to be equitable enough that it does not arouse suspicion. Also, any project that will take a longer time frame than is normal, but does not involve sensitive technologies, can be done at the APD, as this will absorb the extra development time for the immediate profit making side of the normal lab.
If the above strategy is deployed, then two objectives will be accomplished:
Part B: The Projects
Here are the projects that are not disruptive, and can be developed in the “open” lab:
1. Low Pressure Desalination/Distillation
This project has two standpipes that have a height of 10 meters. They can be in a water tower, or even in a well with a 10 meter water level underneath, and the tanks at the surface level. At reduced pressures, water boils at lower temperatures than sea level. This is deliberately engineered so that the water in the boiling, or accelerated evaporation tank, is at or close to the boiling point.
Due to evaporative cooling, the water vapor is routed to the second tank, where it is condensed and drawn down the second standpipe for use. If the system is in a tower, the second catch basin can be used as a place to fill jugs, or as it fills, can be used to pump the water to a pressurized tank for distribution or storage.
This system is much more efficient than reverse osmosis, and less energy intensive, being powered either by solar energy, geothermal, or any means that will make a temperature differential between the two towers.
The original system, using 4 liter vacuum pressure vessels, converts 1 cc per second, or 3.6 liters per hour. The system is proportional to the size of the vessels, so two 400 liter pressure vessels should theoretically produce 360 liters per hour of fresh water, enough for a small community. The cost breakdowns and projections can be produced by spreadsheet analysis upon demand.
2. Power Tower/Power Wall
This Power Tower/Power Wall is in conjunction with any power system that needs storage. It is comprised of lithium ion battery cells loaded into fire suppression tubes for safety, and each battery has overload protection in addition to that. Each tube can have 200-400 watts capacity, and look like a long fuse. Using the lower figure, with 100 tubes, one can have 100 x 200, or 20,000 watts capacity. This is in a space 300mm x 300mm by 1 meter tall. Due to the phenomenal energy density of the lithium batteries, it takes up much less space than conventional lead acid storage batteries, and is ecologically “greener” than they are. It is easier to recycle the lithium cells, as they are now a mature technology.
The original idea sprang from the Tesla Powerwall, and the shortcomings of their design. The Tesla system is simply a box of batteries, and if one ruptures, can cause a cascade failure resulting in a fire. The additional safety features of the new design prevents that possibility, as well as the ability to change out any individual rods if one is found to be defective. Also, it allows the client to decide how many rods they can afford to put in the system, and upgrade later as their budget permits.
Economics:
The Tesla Powerwall is rated for 3000 watts actual (advertised for 10,000) and sells for $3000 USD, or one dollar a watt. Each battery has a capacity of 14.8 watts, and costs 1 Euro, so 20,000 watts will need 1351 batteries, or 1351 Euros worth of batteries for a fully populated tower. Connecting hardware costs another $100, and another $100 for the cabinet for a total of 1551 Euros.
Pricing our product, at the same rate as the Tesla, would result in a sales price of 20,000 Euros or 21,972 dollars. Even though this is a standard markup for many systems, it may be cost prohibitive for many customers, which is why it was designed to be flexible.
Even if we sold it at half the cost, it would still be competitive with the Tesla product, and with a 5:1 markup, which is still profitable. Also, the Tesla Powerwall has a backlog to mid 2017, with a lack of production capacity to make up the difference. We can fill that gap with a superior product, and gain customer loyalty in the process. Life expectancy of the batteries are 5-7 years, which is the same as the Tesla product. With pulse charging techniques, this may be extended using the Bedini method, which is yet to be tested. Bedini claims doubling to tripling the life expectancy of batteries using this method on lead-acid cells, and this may also extend to lithium ion.
3. Crystal Laser Wand (Lux Plasma Wand)
This project has 2 parts: one is a nonlinear crystal pumped by a low power laser, which is giving results in testing thus far, and another is a crystal in a tri-mode pump, using a flash tube, acoustics as well as laser for pumping. That one is having phenomenal success.
It is debatable, at this point, whether this is a disruptive technology that may incur the wrath of the pharma and medical industry. Antoine Priore was ruthlessly suppressed for doing the same thing in the 70’s, but this is a different time, and with the proliferation of energy medicine, it may be “allowable” in the marketplace without significant suppression. We have used this on ourselves for pain relief, colds, and immune activation with impressive results. This is a blending of Priore, Bearden, and Marysol Gonzalez-Sterling sound healing technology for longitudinal pumping of the crystal and personalizing the treatment for maximizing the effect, to use finesse instead of brute force.
Economics:
The simple laser and crystal has a cost of 50-100 euros for the laser and crystal, and another 10 euros for 3D printing the wand assembly. The larger version has a cost of 700-1000 euros for the laser, flashlamp and driver, and frequency/waveform generator and acoustic transducers. Even with low power crystals, it is at least 10 times more powerful than the laser pumped crystal alone. Selling price for the simple system is anticipated to be approximately 300 euros. This price is selected to be within the range of the average consumer, as this is meant to use at home. The LuxPlasma system would be 3-5000 euros, and the target market for that would be for clinicians.
4. Sonic Screwdriver
With possible apologies to the Doctor Who crowd, this one is actually possible to make. A series of acoustic transducers surround a central shaft that resonates like a tuning fork. This works like a miniature impact wrench, with the difference being that it works with sound instead of air pressure. A selector ring is on the outside of the unit, and that adjusts the frequency, which is tuned to the size of the screw. When the metal of the screw is in resonance, it breaks the electrostatic bond between it and the hole it is inside, and moves easily.
A further improvement would be a rotating acoustic field with a movable shank, so that it acts like an electric screwdriver without the motors. A phased field that rotates to the right tightens, and to the left loosens. The life expectancy of the transducers is about 20,000 hours, so even with 12 hours of use a day it will last for about 4 years. The pack can then be replaced as a module. A rechargeable battery pack is also used, with the same life expectancy. A further modular option would be for a detachable shank, where different tools can be inserted for polishing and cutting similar to the Dremel.
Economics:
It is anticipated to cost less than 100 euros to make the prototype, and in mass production the cost will drop to approximately 80. The selling price would be in the neighborhood of 240-320 euros, for a markup of 3:1-4:1. Large sales are expected for the service community, as this means that penetrating oil is not needed for “frozen” screws.
5. Sonic Hair Brush
The Sonic Hair Brush uses ultrasonic transducers connected to the tines of the brush. Hair entanglement is due to electrostatic bonding, and a frequency is selected that neutralizes that bond. The vibrating tines also polish the hair shaft, giving it a better shine. An optional massage head for the scalp can be offered, as well, to help loosen and exfoliate the scalp to prevent dandruff. Of course, the dandruff is a dietary problem, but this is a temporary measure. Scalp massage is also used to increase blood flow for those with aging or thinning hair due to an increase in alpha reductase during menopause. This may provide somewhat of a relief for that. An improved model that includes elements of the laser wand and phase conjugate materials can actually regenerate follicles that are damaged due to chemical exposure, sun or age. In that case, the tines of the brush are made of a fiber optic material.
Economics:
The sound only version can be constructed for 80 euros, with a selling price of 240. Further improvements can drive this price down, for example making the transducers in house. The version with sound and laser with scalp massage would cost at least 300 to build as a prototype, with an eventual production cost of 150, for a sale price of 450. A laser brush is currently being sold in the Biovea catalog for 500, without the tuned PC effects that we will be offering, therefore we will have a superior product at a lower price.
Now for the Disruptive Tech
6. Lux Chrysalis Or Regeneration Pod
The phase conjugation and triplex pumping in the wand was a test case to see if it works, and it does. The next step up is the Lux Chrysalis full body regeneration system. This one will treat the whole body at the same time using the systems approach, as that is really the best approach to integrated living organisms.
This uses an array of fast phase conjugate crystals pumped with plasma tubes lining the interior. The first system will probably use a Wolf tanning bed, and we would replace the mercury vapor tubes with a gas mixture that optimizes the pump wave output. This is no small project, as it will require the purchase of equipment to do our own crystal growing, as it will be too cost prohibitive to do the project otherwise, running up the cost to hundreds of thousands of euros. The crystal growing equipment will be necessary for production anyway, so it would be purchased early in the project to keep costs down. The crucible and pulling system typically costs approximately 5000 euros.
When Priore did full body treatments on his mice, 99.9% were cured of cancer. This is what makes it a disruptive technology, as any cancer patient is 250,000 euros worth of income “on the hoof” as one pharma company was quoted as saying. We will be taking away their income as well as saving lives—which is VERY VERY disruptive. But there was one other side effect that he noted, and it was that the mice appeared younger! This is predicted in the Bearden provisional patent.
Time reversal on the cellular level is extremely controversial, and the possibility of having a regeneration clinic becomes very real at this point. The theoretical maximum would be one year of regeneration for every 8-9 hours, so a sleeping pod would be designed, and the patient would wake up 9 hours later feeling not only refreshed, but younger. The dead tissue would have to be flushed from the system to start again, so every other day or so you go back into the pod for another treatment.
The financially wealthy already have this tech--it’s about time we all do as well. Look at the system in Elysium that was used to do this very same thing. It will need to be done at a remote area, to avoid suspicion, possibly at or near the location of the second lab. Possible complications of exposure is the military sequestering the tech.
Economics:
it will probably take 20,000 euros or more to produce a prototype, with production models running less than that figure. Additional equipment costs may drive this to 30,000. This is not a cheap project, but the payback is phenomenally greater than the others. It will also take the most time, as we are talking about 2-5 years for completion of the project, as it involves resurrecting old tech from Tesla’s time, as well as learning new techniques for crystal growing and production, building upon those already known. Even if the cost per pod cannot be reduced significantly, it is still a good price for the average clinic. Each pod will require 500-1000 watts of electricity to run them, so a clinic with 10 of these will require 10 KW dedicated to the regeneration system.
7. Gen II Lux Plasma System
The Gen II Lux Plasma System is placed into a cell phone case, and uses “fast” phase conjugators. It is the wand in miniature, used for first aid. This one is carried into a backpack or purse, and used when a medical emergency is encountered. It can accelerate bone healing once it is set, or once abrasions are cleaned, disinfect and accelerate the healing of that, producing stem cells directly into the tissues using the Beck effect.
Economics:
2000 euros to begin with. Unfortunately, it will be more economical to have a crystal growing system in-house to grow, grind and fit the crystals. Vendor processing will be very expensive, costing at least 500-1000 euros per crystal, and the electronics will be in addition to that price. Casing can be 3D printed for 10 euros per unit in carbon fiber/kevlar composite, making it nearly indestructible. A quartz window will be scratch resistant, as well as allowing the UV to link to the optics and electronics for tissue regeneration. That will cost 10 euros per unit. Equipment needed will be a surface grinder, lathe with tool post grinder, 3D printer with case hardened nozzle, and crystal growing oven with kiln/pulling system.
8. Figuera Generator
Clemente Figuera in the 1900s designed a system to generate electrical power in conjunction with Nikola Tesla. He found a way to shunt the back EMF into a separate coil, and that meant that the primary of his transformer did not see the power draw from the secondary. The story is that he ran a 20 HP pump with his system, and many witnesses saw the unit in operation. Patrick J. Kelly as well as Rex Research detailed the history of the device, and some have done an incomplete and “half-assed” attempt, not being adept experimentalists.
After 100 years, we have a working theory for this device, and it is time to revisit Mr. Figuera’s brainchild. The first unit will generate approximately 500 watts using an experimental material that is 3D printed—printable iron ferrite. If that does not have the requisite properties, then a core can be made from Permag in the UK that is tape wound. Since his system works with hysteresis instead of against it, no special metglas material is needed. 500 watts per hour is 12 KW per day, and is the typical demand for a solar home during inclement weather. Two such units can produce 24 KW per day, and modular units can be stacked together for increased capacity. This is also considered disruptive, and can be disguised as either a “power conditioner” or some similar nomenclature. The modularity is consistent with the modular nature of the power tower, and can be designed to be a part of it.
Economics:
The cost is approximately 100 euros for the printable ferrite, which has already been purchased and is ready to go with the most recent mods to the STL files. The wire will be hand-wound, and will be 50 euros for that. Driving electronics, rather than the motor Figuera used, will consist of another 50 Euros, making the total for the prototype 200 Euros. The cores will either be glued or snap in place, and the glue is not significant in cost—perhaps 10 cents or so. Testing will be done in house, without cost.
9. Gabriel Kron Negative Resistor
The information for this resistor was gathered from Tom Bearden, and sounds extremely plausible based on my past experience. Gabe was an engineer with GE, and worked on two main projects: A condenser microphone, and PTC thermistor. There are clues about the two of these and a possible third crossover project that combined elements of the two. He made a device, now called a “negative resistor” that powered a network analyzer that most likely took 200 watts to run.
So we know the power output of the device. It most likely took the manufacturing techniques of the thermistor and added polarization to it, so that when the electrons “jumped” the gaps between the nanoparticles inside the composite, they received an additional kick from the local electric field in the material, thus acting like an accelerator, and therefore producing negative resistance.
The other possibility is that there is a tunneling effect between particles, and the electron interacts in its probabilistic wave state with the local electric field to gain energy from, or as Bearden calls it-- “an-energy”. To accomplish this we need to research the manufacturing techniques of the thermistor in Kron’s time, and apply a polarizing field in it’s plastic transition state to polarize it.
If the initial prototype is successful, then the next step is scaling up and down. Down to embedded on-board power supplies that are permanent in all microelectronics, and up to megawatt capacities for boats and aircraft. This will allow decentralization of all power generation, and if we begin small, then it will remain undetected just as in Gabriel Kron’s day, and we can “sneak in” this disruptive tech without raising any red flags.
Economics:
It is estimated that with access to an external machine shop with a hydraulic press, it will be comparatively cheap to produce. The first prototypes will be small in scale, probably just a few watts for proof of concept and will cost no more than 1-2000 euros to set up and test. After the device scale up and down will cost another 2-3000, with additional costing for endurance and test-to-destruction to find weak points in the design and correct those.
10. Permanent Battery (Based on Kron Negative Resistor)
The Permanent Battery is an update on what we believe is the Kron negative resistor. In this device, a high dielectric material is polarized, which also induces vacuum polarization within the device. Also inside are conductive particles of a proprietary compound that allow for high electron conduction with low resistance. In a simple thermistor, the filler material is not polarized, but in this one it is.
In a PTC thermistor, as the temperature goes up the spacing between the conductive particles increases, and that means the electrons have to jump larger and larger gaps, inducing a larger loss in energy, and thus a loss in eletromotive force, which is scattered. But instead of a scattering effect, it is converging instead of diverging, and electrons have their velocity increased as they bridge the gap, as the device acts as a solid state particle accelerator for electrons.
Here is an analogy: Imagine there is a stream, and you want to cross that stream by hopping onto the rocks from one shore to the other. It takes energy to hop from one rock to the other, and you’re a little tired by the time you get to the other side. This is a loss of energy, and the hopping analogy is what the electrons do in the material. Now let’s imagine that there are people on either side of the rocks in the stream that give you a push and pull as you hop from one rock to the other. You can’t help but cross from rock to rock faster and faster until you leap onto the shore on the other end with a greater speed than you started with.
But where does the energy come from? The vacuum itself, which according to Seike has 1093 ergs per cubic centimeter, more energy than every star in the galaxy that is shining. Trying to exhaust this is like trying to empty the ocean with a teaspoon. Locally the effects are infinitesimal, and below the level of observation for any individual unit.
But what happens when we have an entire planet running on these? At the petawatt level, the binding energy of nucleons will be significantly increased to the point where the nuclear weapons stockpile will be rendered inactive. With the increase in the amount of critical mass to do this, both the nuclear weapons industry as well as the nuclear power industry will have a very bad day indeed, which is why this tech is suppressed so ruthlessly. Also interesting to note is the background radiation count will also be reduced, as well as the cancers and accelerated aging associated with that. Also a bad day for the homicidal eugenicists, who are promoting dirty tech for just that reason.
Economics:
No exotic materials are expected to be needed for the unit, and the processing will be the primary part of the proprietary trade secret for now. If the other side uses undue aggression to stop the use of the technology, then it will be open sourced with several different venues of distribution to ensure that all parties that can develop it will put it into production.
The actual dollar value will be based on power output, and it is anticipated to be less than $1000-$2000 USD per kilowatt. This is in direct competition with wind and solar, and those are also anticipated to produce dirty marketing and propaganda tactics to attempt to discredit the technology.
The Permanent Battery will also mean a 10-20% increase in appliances that will have an embedded “power pack” inside each unit. Some will require a small inverter to transform the DC output to AC, while others can be used with DC directly, such as toasters, resistance heaters and universal motors such as inside vacuum cleaners. For new construction, or in the case of Purple Paradise Resort domes, no household wiring will be necessary, taking into account the average cost to wire a house is $2-4 per sq ft.
Projected lifespan of the device depends on the final configuration, but is anticipated to be 70-100 years per unit, varying with the ion degradation of the materials. This is seen at an accelerated rate in lithium ion batteries, which last 2-3 years. In these units the chemistry will be far more stable, and will last much, much longer as a result. Also, the solid state electronics in the inverter units will have a shorter life expectancy, in the range of 10-15 years. This is unavoidable unless we do our own units in house, and not depend on slipshod manufacturing techniques in third world countries.
CONCLUSION:
Separating the two labs will be a necessity at some point, as too much interest will be generated otherwise. If it is done on Mojacar, then space can be rented for the consumer grade devices, and the others can be produced at a separate, undisclosed location. Presently, all the equipment to test the energy generating devices is here on site, and equipment to do anything additional can be purchased on an “as needed” basis to keep costs down.
For the medical devices, a dark field scope would be helpful to see the changes in tissue and blood before and after treatment. Approximately $1000 USD.
Ultimately, this is all do-able. With the consumer grade devices providing an income stream to keep the other research going, both labs can be funded internally. Any investment would have therefore a reasonable ROI to deal with, and guaranteed profitability as long as management is handled correctly.
To receive the entire Proposal, use the Contact Us form. We will respond as soon as possible.
Part A: Strategy
First considerations to be made:
Any public presentation has to be attractive for development. There are many that are needed, but are too dry for the general public to find interesting. In today’s world, the typical surfer on the web has an attention span of 30 seconds. That means that this paragraph is already too long for most that peruse the web, and project managers want at most a 1 page summary for a typical project, which is difficult to distill, unless one puts them into a Power Point presentation.
Politics: Any project has to conform to the political constraints of society and is especially true of any deemed “disruptive” product. This is a very severe constraint, as most new tech is disruptive to the political status quo. When I wrote the paper “Politics and Energy”, I outlined that inventors—the creative elements necessary to the future of society—are now considered expendable, and the ones cognizant of this fact hide like rabbits while they work in secret. The ones who are less savvy try to present it as if they will be hailed heroes only to discover that their homes are bombed and burglarized and loved ones threatened or killed.
So we have two severe constraints to deal with. The first one is easily dealt with, but the second has to be considered carefully with an airtight strategy. With that in mind here is the plan:
There is a binary plan that comprises two things that accomplish both goals simultaneously: We do what every large corporation or government think tank does—we have a front organization that produces consumer grade devices that are not disruptive, but innovative enough to catch the interest of the consumer. These can be as innocuous as ultrasonic hair brushes, or screwdrivers that are tuned to the screw they are supposed to loosen. They can be innovative, but not disruptive power storage systems like the power wall or power tower. We can have an entire catalog of non-disruptive tech that is offered both to the public as well as investors. These items are “sexy” enough that it catches the interest, and sell well. They are also simple enough that they can be put into production quickly with a good ROI (return on investment).
The other part is called the Advanced Projects Division (APD). The APD may not be physically at the same location, but communicates with the front office, and also shares resources to mask what it is doing. In the engineering companies where I worked, even CEOs would not want to go there unless absolutely necessary to give them plausible deniability to the CFO. The APD works on tech that may be 6 months to 5 years away from market. The people who work at the APD are cloistered away to prevent leaking the tech to either competitors or government that might consider stealing it. They remain focused and move forward quietly. When the tech has come to full term, they patent it using international patents in multiple countries to prevent one nation-state from stealing it in the name of national security. The inventor/engineers are protected while they work there, and are compensated well for their creative abilities, also owning a part of their work either as their own names or pseudonyms. This prevents the “open season on inventors” syndrome.
It has to be determined what the fraction will be as far as the division between the front office/lab and APD. It has to be equitable enough that it does not arouse suspicion. Also, any project that will take a longer time frame than is normal, but does not involve sensitive technologies, can be done at the APD, as this will absorb the extra development time for the immediate profit making side of the normal lab.
If the above strategy is deployed, then two objectives will be accomplished:
- A profitable lab for the company will be developed, which will hide the material expenditures for the APD.
- A covert lab (APD) will be developed with high security, that can funnel the developed projects that have disruptive technology to other locations, thus securing the first lab from liability, or scrutiny and vulnerability to shut down by federal or state agencies.
Part B: The Projects
Here are the projects that are not disruptive, and can be developed in the “open” lab:
1. Low Pressure Desalination/Distillation
This project has two standpipes that have a height of 10 meters. They can be in a water tower, or even in a well with a 10 meter water level underneath, and the tanks at the surface level. At reduced pressures, water boils at lower temperatures than sea level. This is deliberately engineered so that the water in the boiling, or accelerated evaporation tank, is at or close to the boiling point.
Due to evaporative cooling, the water vapor is routed to the second tank, where it is condensed and drawn down the second standpipe for use. If the system is in a tower, the second catch basin can be used as a place to fill jugs, or as it fills, can be used to pump the water to a pressurized tank for distribution or storage.
This system is much more efficient than reverse osmosis, and less energy intensive, being powered either by solar energy, geothermal, or any means that will make a temperature differential between the two towers.
The original system, using 4 liter vacuum pressure vessels, converts 1 cc per second, or 3.6 liters per hour. The system is proportional to the size of the vessels, so two 400 liter pressure vessels should theoretically produce 360 liters per hour of fresh water, enough for a small community. The cost breakdowns and projections can be produced by spreadsheet analysis upon demand.
2. Power Tower/Power Wall
This Power Tower/Power Wall is in conjunction with any power system that needs storage. It is comprised of lithium ion battery cells loaded into fire suppression tubes for safety, and each battery has overload protection in addition to that. Each tube can have 200-400 watts capacity, and look like a long fuse. Using the lower figure, with 100 tubes, one can have 100 x 200, or 20,000 watts capacity. This is in a space 300mm x 300mm by 1 meter tall. Due to the phenomenal energy density of the lithium batteries, it takes up much less space than conventional lead acid storage batteries, and is ecologically “greener” than they are. It is easier to recycle the lithium cells, as they are now a mature technology.
The original idea sprang from the Tesla Powerwall, and the shortcomings of their design. The Tesla system is simply a box of batteries, and if one ruptures, can cause a cascade failure resulting in a fire. The additional safety features of the new design prevents that possibility, as well as the ability to change out any individual rods if one is found to be defective. Also, it allows the client to decide how many rods they can afford to put in the system, and upgrade later as their budget permits.
Economics:
The Tesla Powerwall is rated for 3000 watts actual (advertised for 10,000) and sells for $3000 USD, or one dollar a watt. Each battery has a capacity of 14.8 watts, and costs 1 Euro, so 20,000 watts will need 1351 batteries, or 1351 Euros worth of batteries for a fully populated tower. Connecting hardware costs another $100, and another $100 for the cabinet for a total of 1551 Euros.
Pricing our product, at the same rate as the Tesla, would result in a sales price of 20,000 Euros or 21,972 dollars. Even though this is a standard markup for many systems, it may be cost prohibitive for many customers, which is why it was designed to be flexible.
Even if we sold it at half the cost, it would still be competitive with the Tesla product, and with a 5:1 markup, which is still profitable. Also, the Tesla Powerwall has a backlog to mid 2017, with a lack of production capacity to make up the difference. We can fill that gap with a superior product, and gain customer loyalty in the process. Life expectancy of the batteries are 5-7 years, which is the same as the Tesla product. With pulse charging techniques, this may be extended using the Bedini method, which is yet to be tested. Bedini claims doubling to tripling the life expectancy of batteries using this method on lead-acid cells, and this may also extend to lithium ion.
3. Crystal Laser Wand (Lux Plasma Wand)
This project has 2 parts: one is a nonlinear crystal pumped by a low power laser, which is giving results in testing thus far, and another is a crystal in a tri-mode pump, using a flash tube, acoustics as well as laser for pumping. That one is having phenomenal success.
It is debatable, at this point, whether this is a disruptive technology that may incur the wrath of the pharma and medical industry. Antoine Priore was ruthlessly suppressed for doing the same thing in the 70’s, but this is a different time, and with the proliferation of energy medicine, it may be “allowable” in the marketplace without significant suppression. We have used this on ourselves for pain relief, colds, and immune activation with impressive results. This is a blending of Priore, Bearden, and Marysol Gonzalez-Sterling sound healing technology for longitudinal pumping of the crystal and personalizing the treatment for maximizing the effect, to use finesse instead of brute force.
Economics:
The simple laser and crystal has a cost of 50-100 euros for the laser and crystal, and another 10 euros for 3D printing the wand assembly. The larger version has a cost of 700-1000 euros for the laser, flashlamp and driver, and frequency/waveform generator and acoustic transducers. Even with low power crystals, it is at least 10 times more powerful than the laser pumped crystal alone. Selling price for the simple system is anticipated to be approximately 300 euros. This price is selected to be within the range of the average consumer, as this is meant to use at home. The LuxPlasma system would be 3-5000 euros, and the target market for that would be for clinicians.
4. Sonic Screwdriver
With possible apologies to the Doctor Who crowd, this one is actually possible to make. A series of acoustic transducers surround a central shaft that resonates like a tuning fork. This works like a miniature impact wrench, with the difference being that it works with sound instead of air pressure. A selector ring is on the outside of the unit, and that adjusts the frequency, which is tuned to the size of the screw. When the metal of the screw is in resonance, it breaks the electrostatic bond between it and the hole it is inside, and moves easily.
A further improvement would be a rotating acoustic field with a movable shank, so that it acts like an electric screwdriver without the motors. A phased field that rotates to the right tightens, and to the left loosens. The life expectancy of the transducers is about 20,000 hours, so even with 12 hours of use a day it will last for about 4 years. The pack can then be replaced as a module. A rechargeable battery pack is also used, with the same life expectancy. A further modular option would be for a detachable shank, where different tools can be inserted for polishing and cutting similar to the Dremel.
Economics:
It is anticipated to cost less than 100 euros to make the prototype, and in mass production the cost will drop to approximately 80. The selling price would be in the neighborhood of 240-320 euros, for a markup of 3:1-4:1. Large sales are expected for the service community, as this means that penetrating oil is not needed for “frozen” screws.
5. Sonic Hair Brush
The Sonic Hair Brush uses ultrasonic transducers connected to the tines of the brush. Hair entanglement is due to electrostatic bonding, and a frequency is selected that neutralizes that bond. The vibrating tines also polish the hair shaft, giving it a better shine. An optional massage head for the scalp can be offered, as well, to help loosen and exfoliate the scalp to prevent dandruff. Of course, the dandruff is a dietary problem, but this is a temporary measure. Scalp massage is also used to increase blood flow for those with aging or thinning hair due to an increase in alpha reductase during menopause. This may provide somewhat of a relief for that. An improved model that includes elements of the laser wand and phase conjugate materials can actually regenerate follicles that are damaged due to chemical exposure, sun or age. In that case, the tines of the brush are made of a fiber optic material.
Economics:
The sound only version can be constructed for 80 euros, with a selling price of 240. Further improvements can drive this price down, for example making the transducers in house. The version with sound and laser with scalp massage would cost at least 300 to build as a prototype, with an eventual production cost of 150, for a sale price of 450. A laser brush is currently being sold in the Biovea catalog for 500, without the tuned PC effects that we will be offering, therefore we will have a superior product at a lower price.
Now for the Disruptive Tech
6. Lux Chrysalis Or Regeneration Pod
The phase conjugation and triplex pumping in the wand was a test case to see if it works, and it does. The next step up is the Lux Chrysalis full body regeneration system. This one will treat the whole body at the same time using the systems approach, as that is really the best approach to integrated living organisms.
This uses an array of fast phase conjugate crystals pumped with plasma tubes lining the interior. The first system will probably use a Wolf tanning bed, and we would replace the mercury vapor tubes with a gas mixture that optimizes the pump wave output. This is no small project, as it will require the purchase of equipment to do our own crystal growing, as it will be too cost prohibitive to do the project otherwise, running up the cost to hundreds of thousands of euros. The crystal growing equipment will be necessary for production anyway, so it would be purchased early in the project to keep costs down. The crucible and pulling system typically costs approximately 5000 euros.
When Priore did full body treatments on his mice, 99.9% were cured of cancer. This is what makes it a disruptive technology, as any cancer patient is 250,000 euros worth of income “on the hoof” as one pharma company was quoted as saying. We will be taking away their income as well as saving lives—which is VERY VERY disruptive. But there was one other side effect that he noted, and it was that the mice appeared younger! This is predicted in the Bearden provisional patent.
Time reversal on the cellular level is extremely controversial, and the possibility of having a regeneration clinic becomes very real at this point. The theoretical maximum would be one year of regeneration for every 8-9 hours, so a sleeping pod would be designed, and the patient would wake up 9 hours later feeling not only refreshed, but younger. The dead tissue would have to be flushed from the system to start again, so every other day or so you go back into the pod for another treatment.
The financially wealthy already have this tech--it’s about time we all do as well. Look at the system in Elysium that was used to do this very same thing. It will need to be done at a remote area, to avoid suspicion, possibly at or near the location of the second lab. Possible complications of exposure is the military sequestering the tech.
Economics:
it will probably take 20,000 euros or more to produce a prototype, with production models running less than that figure. Additional equipment costs may drive this to 30,000. This is not a cheap project, but the payback is phenomenally greater than the others. It will also take the most time, as we are talking about 2-5 years for completion of the project, as it involves resurrecting old tech from Tesla’s time, as well as learning new techniques for crystal growing and production, building upon those already known. Even if the cost per pod cannot be reduced significantly, it is still a good price for the average clinic. Each pod will require 500-1000 watts of electricity to run them, so a clinic with 10 of these will require 10 KW dedicated to the regeneration system.
7. Gen II Lux Plasma System
The Gen II Lux Plasma System is placed into a cell phone case, and uses “fast” phase conjugators. It is the wand in miniature, used for first aid. This one is carried into a backpack or purse, and used when a medical emergency is encountered. It can accelerate bone healing once it is set, or once abrasions are cleaned, disinfect and accelerate the healing of that, producing stem cells directly into the tissues using the Beck effect.
Economics:
2000 euros to begin with. Unfortunately, it will be more economical to have a crystal growing system in-house to grow, grind and fit the crystals. Vendor processing will be very expensive, costing at least 500-1000 euros per crystal, and the electronics will be in addition to that price. Casing can be 3D printed for 10 euros per unit in carbon fiber/kevlar composite, making it nearly indestructible. A quartz window will be scratch resistant, as well as allowing the UV to link to the optics and electronics for tissue regeneration. That will cost 10 euros per unit. Equipment needed will be a surface grinder, lathe with tool post grinder, 3D printer with case hardened nozzle, and crystal growing oven with kiln/pulling system.
8. Figuera Generator
Clemente Figuera in the 1900s designed a system to generate electrical power in conjunction with Nikola Tesla. He found a way to shunt the back EMF into a separate coil, and that meant that the primary of his transformer did not see the power draw from the secondary. The story is that he ran a 20 HP pump with his system, and many witnesses saw the unit in operation. Patrick J. Kelly as well as Rex Research detailed the history of the device, and some have done an incomplete and “half-assed” attempt, not being adept experimentalists.
After 100 years, we have a working theory for this device, and it is time to revisit Mr. Figuera’s brainchild. The first unit will generate approximately 500 watts using an experimental material that is 3D printed—printable iron ferrite. If that does not have the requisite properties, then a core can be made from Permag in the UK that is tape wound. Since his system works with hysteresis instead of against it, no special metglas material is needed. 500 watts per hour is 12 KW per day, and is the typical demand for a solar home during inclement weather. Two such units can produce 24 KW per day, and modular units can be stacked together for increased capacity. This is also considered disruptive, and can be disguised as either a “power conditioner” or some similar nomenclature. The modularity is consistent with the modular nature of the power tower, and can be designed to be a part of it.
Economics:
The cost is approximately 100 euros for the printable ferrite, which has already been purchased and is ready to go with the most recent mods to the STL files. The wire will be hand-wound, and will be 50 euros for that. Driving electronics, rather than the motor Figuera used, will consist of another 50 Euros, making the total for the prototype 200 Euros. The cores will either be glued or snap in place, and the glue is not significant in cost—perhaps 10 cents or so. Testing will be done in house, without cost.
9. Gabriel Kron Negative Resistor
The information for this resistor was gathered from Tom Bearden, and sounds extremely plausible based on my past experience. Gabe was an engineer with GE, and worked on two main projects: A condenser microphone, and PTC thermistor. There are clues about the two of these and a possible third crossover project that combined elements of the two. He made a device, now called a “negative resistor” that powered a network analyzer that most likely took 200 watts to run.
So we know the power output of the device. It most likely took the manufacturing techniques of the thermistor and added polarization to it, so that when the electrons “jumped” the gaps between the nanoparticles inside the composite, they received an additional kick from the local electric field in the material, thus acting like an accelerator, and therefore producing negative resistance.
The other possibility is that there is a tunneling effect between particles, and the electron interacts in its probabilistic wave state with the local electric field to gain energy from, or as Bearden calls it-- “an-energy”. To accomplish this we need to research the manufacturing techniques of the thermistor in Kron’s time, and apply a polarizing field in it’s plastic transition state to polarize it.
If the initial prototype is successful, then the next step is scaling up and down. Down to embedded on-board power supplies that are permanent in all microelectronics, and up to megawatt capacities for boats and aircraft. This will allow decentralization of all power generation, and if we begin small, then it will remain undetected just as in Gabriel Kron’s day, and we can “sneak in” this disruptive tech without raising any red flags.
Economics:
It is estimated that with access to an external machine shop with a hydraulic press, it will be comparatively cheap to produce. The first prototypes will be small in scale, probably just a few watts for proof of concept and will cost no more than 1-2000 euros to set up and test. After the device scale up and down will cost another 2-3000, with additional costing for endurance and test-to-destruction to find weak points in the design and correct those.
10. Permanent Battery (Based on Kron Negative Resistor)
The Permanent Battery is an update on what we believe is the Kron negative resistor. In this device, a high dielectric material is polarized, which also induces vacuum polarization within the device. Also inside are conductive particles of a proprietary compound that allow for high electron conduction with low resistance. In a simple thermistor, the filler material is not polarized, but in this one it is.
In a PTC thermistor, as the temperature goes up the spacing between the conductive particles increases, and that means the electrons have to jump larger and larger gaps, inducing a larger loss in energy, and thus a loss in eletromotive force, which is scattered. But instead of a scattering effect, it is converging instead of diverging, and electrons have their velocity increased as they bridge the gap, as the device acts as a solid state particle accelerator for electrons.
Here is an analogy: Imagine there is a stream, and you want to cross that stream by hopping onto the rocks from one shore to the other. It takes energy to hop from one rock to the other, and you’re a little tired by the time you get to the other side. This is a loss of energy, and the hopping analogy is what the electrons do in the material. Now let’s imagine that there are people on either side of the rocks in the stream that give you a push and pull as you hop from one rock to the other. You can’t help but cross from rock to rock faster and faster until you leap onto the shore on the other end with a greater speed than you started with.
But where does the energy come from? The vacuum itself, which according to Seike has 1093 ergs per cubic centimeter, more energy than every star in the galaxy that is shining. Trying to exhaust this is like trying to empty the ocean with a teaspoon. Locally the effects are infinitesimal, and below the level of observation for any individual unit.
But what happens when we have an entire planet running on these? At the petawatt level, the binding energy of nucleons will be significantly increased to the point where the nuclear weapons stockpile will be rendered inactive. With the increase in the amount of critical mass to do this, both the nuclear weapons industry as well as the nuclear power industry will have a very bad day indeed, which is why this tech is suppressed so ruthlessly. Also interesting to note is the background radiation count will also be reduced, as well as the cancers and accelerated aging associated with that. Also a bad day for the homicidal eugenicists, who are promoting dirty tech for just that reason.
Economics:
No exotic materials are expected to be needed for the unit, and the processing will be the primary part of the proprietary trade secret for now. If the other side uses undue aggression to stop the use of the technology, then it will be open sourced with several different venues of distribution to ensure that all parties that can develop it will put it into production.
The actual dollar value will be based on power output, and it is anticipated to be less than $1000-$2000 USD per kilowatt. This is in direct competition with wind and solar, and those are also anticipated to produce dirty marketing and propaganda tactics to attempt to discredit the technology.
The Permanent Battery will also mean a 10-20% increase in appliances that will have an embedded “power pack” inside each unit. Some will require a small inverter to transform the DC output to AC, while others can be used with DC directly, such as toasters, resistance heaters and universal motors such as inside vacuum cleaners. For new construction, or in the case of Purple Paradise Resort domes, no household wiring will be necessary, taking into account the average cost to wire a house is $2-4 per sq ft.
Projected lifespan of the device depends on the final configuration, but is anticipated to be 70-100 years per unit, varying with the ion degradation of the materials. This is seen at an accelerated rate in lithium ion batteries, which last 2-3 years. In these units the chemistry will be far more stable, and will last much, much longer as a result. Also, the solid state electronics in the inverter units will have a shorter life expectancy, in the range of 10-15 years. This is unavoidable unless we do our own units in house, and not depend on slipshod manufacturing techniques in third world countries.
CONCLUSION:
Separating the two labs will be a necessity at some point, as too much interest will be generated otherwise. If it is done on Mojacar, then space can be rented for the consumer grade devices, and the others can be produced at a separate, undisclosed location. Presently, all the equipment to test the energy generating devices is here on site, and equipment to do anything additional can be purchased on an “as needed” basis to keep costs down.
For the medical devices, a dark field scope would be helpful to see the changes in tissue and blood before and after treatment. Approximately $1000 USD.
Ultimately, this is all do-able. With the consumer grade devices providing an income stream to keep the other research going, both labs can be funded internally. Any investment would have therefore a reasonable ROI to deal with, and guaranteed profitability as long as management is handled correctly.
To receive the entire Proposal, use the Contact Us form. We will respond as soon as possible.
You may use the address below to contribute bitcoin to
Purple Paradise Resort:
3EvyFG6n6YqCQQn2aDW7aJtsDFrVfJ69n3
Purple Paradise Resort:
3EvyFG6n6YqCQQn2aDW7aJtsDFrVfJ69n3
Or scan this QR Code on your smartphone to
send bitcoin directly from your wallet to PPR's wallet.
Thank you for your Contribution, it is Greatly Appreciated.
Let's Change Our World Together!!!
If you know what a (PPP) Private Placement Platform is and would like more information, please connect with us via the form on the Contact Us page or write to admin@purpleparadiseresort.com.
Let's Change Our World Together!!!
If you know what a (PPP) Private Placement Platform is and would like more information, please connect with us via the form on the Contact Us page or write to admin@purpleparadiseresort.com.
